single

myimage37.png

May 13 2017

Saturday – Experimenting with footstretcher setting

There was no time for a long outing today. There wasn’t even the possibility, because the Youth regatta was in full swing and the lake was closed for other rowers.

I wanted to test some foot stretcher settings, so I figured that it was OK to use a remote corner of the lake that is outside the main traffic patterns.

There has been some discussion on rec.sport.rowing on how to set the footstretcher, and about speed gains to be achieved by setting the foot stretcher towards the stern (larger catch angle, more efficient stroke, etc). I decided to do an experiment.

Row 2x250m (one in each direction, with 250m “rest” to turn) with each foot stretcher setting. Try to hold 300W as closely as possible. Measure total time over 500m. Running start. Stroke rate free.

Today there was almost no wind and the water was flat.

The 300W is submaximal, which makes it easy to hold steady and focus on technique. So after a few minutes of warming up, I set off for the first set of 2x250m. Then I changed the footstretcher as much as possible towards the bow (where I was limited by my backstops which I didn’t want to change OTW), and repeated the experiment.

I did have the feeling that there was slightly more “light wind” than in the first run, though. This may have destroyed the experiment.

The second set with the bow-wards setting felt weird, and I had a lot of room between my belly and my scull handles at the tap-down. Here are the overview graphs:myimage (37)

 

myimage (36)

Here are the Empower force curves:

 

So only a 5 degree shift in catch and finish angles for what feels very different in the boat. The stroke felt much lighter with the bow-ward setting. Now on to the verdict.

My “normal” setting (larger catch angle):


Workout Summary - media/20170513-144854-Sanders SpeedCoach 20170513 0929amo.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|-Avg-|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|-Pwr-|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|00500|01:58.8|01:58.7|302.9|29.4|159.1|171.0|08.6
W-|00500|01:58.8|01:58.8|302.9|29.3|159.1|171.0|08.6
R-|00000|00:00.0|00:00.0|000.0|00.0|000.0|171.0|00.0
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|-Pwr-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
00|00250|01:00.8|02:01.6|306.9|29.6|154.5|167.0|08.3
01|00250|00:58.0|01:56.0|298.7|29.1|163.9|171.0|08.9

And the “bow-ward” setting (shorter catch angle):


Workout Summary - media/20170513-144939-Sanders SpeedCoach 20170513 0938amo.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|-Avg-|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|-Pwr-|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|00500|01:59.0|01:58.9|304.4|29.4|161.5|174.0|08.6
W-|00500|01:59.0|01:59.0|304.4|29.4|161.5|174.0|08.6
R-|00000|00:00.0|00:00.0|000.0|00.0|000.0|174.0|00.0
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|-Pwr-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
00|00250|00:59.8|01:59.6|304.3|29.7|157.3|170.0|08.4
01|00250|00:59.2|01:58.4|304.5|29.0|165.7|174.0|08.7

For completeness, the SpeedCoach itself reports 1:58.8 time at 29.0 spm and 301W for the “normal” setting, and 1:59.0 at 29.0spm and 306W with the bow-ward setting.

So almost the same total time with a power difference of 1% (5W at most). This is in the order of magnitude that I was expecting, and the question is whether the measurement system is accurate enough to measure such small differences.

But it was fun to do, and I am going to stick with my “normal” setting with the larger catch angles.

By • Uncategorized • 1 • Tags: , , , ,

wash

May 11 2017

Thursday – Steady State

Every day is different this week. Today it was a nice 21 degrees and sunny. Krocan and I went out in singles and we did a long steady state row. It was choppy when we started and flat when we finished. In the chop, I rowed away from Krocan easily. On flat water, the difference was smaller. I worked on sending the boat at the finish, tapping down clean and keeping the wash metric low.

 

You can see how the total drive length has a much smaller spread than the effective length.

On rowsandall.com, the wash numbers always look a bit worse than what I expect from the numbers I see in the boat.

All this focus on “wash”. Does it really pay off? I decided to filter my rowsandall.com OTW rows on “Steady State” and look at the median value of Wash and its standard deviation. The result is sobering:

I added the average wind strength as reported by the Dark Sky network to the plot. It seems the wind (and probably chop) is the biggest factor influencing the Wash value and its spread.

 

By • Uncategorized • 3 • Tags: , , , ,

typicalvalues2.jpg

May 11 2017

Two rest days and a hard session (lactate, lactate!)

Monday was a travel and tourism day, and tuesday was a very long day at work, and after the long weekend I was behind on a couple of important work related duties, as well as evening conference calls with final reviews of some project proposals, so I had to skip training. I didn’t mind much. I think a 2 day gap now and then, when life and work get in the way, is actually quite healthy and definitely not detrimental.

This also gave me a motivation to do a really hard training, although I chickened out of what our head coach had posted on the training plan board:

2x(7×50″/10″) @ 34-36 spm, 5 minutes rest between the 2 sets

That is like 30 strokes “on”, 3 strokes “rest”, for 7 minutes, at a stroke rate that I cannot hold for 4 minutes. Driving to the rowing club, I was thinking of what to do with these instructions. I was also curious to see how many of our Masters rowers would turn up on this Wednesday and what boat type I would row.

Turns out that through back injuries, work related duties, business travel, we had 4 rowers of our eight, plus 1 younger guy who rows with the Masters group occasionally. The issue, however, was that that one guy is not comfortable rowing a single, and one of the others is not a sculler. He only rows sweep. I got a little impatient when we hadn’t decided after 25 minutes so I announced that I would go in the single (which would also enable me to row my own session). The sweep rower Bulda teamed up with Krocan to take a pair, and the remaining two got out in a double.

We have the full Albano lanes out because of the International Youth Regatta of coming weekend, so I wanted to do 2x”something intensive at high stroke rates” in the 2k course. My training phase prescribes ANC training, which is short intervals with rest, and many of them, to get the body to produce lactate (as fuel, which I will condition the body to use in the subsequent phase).

[amazon_link asins=’B00O5Y4FXA’ template=’ProductAd’ store=’rowingdata-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’d9b314bd-3613-11e7-8a0e-454df77c6fc6′]

After 2k of warming up, I stopped to fiddle with my HR strap. I had the feeling that it was too lose and that I felt the strap on my back creeping down slowly. So I tried to adjust it back, which led to it snapping. The Wahoo Tickr straps connect with snap fasteners to the sensor “pod”. They call it the “two-snap” connection which is easy to get on and off. Well. It snapped. Under two layers of clothing (because it was cold), with me being in a single on cold water.

So I removed the upper part of my uni, clamped the scull handles between my belly and my legs, and tried to use two hands to snap on the HR strap. Initially, I failed, and I ended up holding only the sensor, with the strap being somewhere under my clothes, and discovering that my left blade had turned and was now perpendicular to the water, in flipping position. I corrected that, and proceeded to struggle. In the end I managed to snap everything back on and get my clothes in order as well. Without flipping.

Krocan proposed 20 strokes “on”, 10 strokes “off”, and that seemed a very good compromise. At this point, I was incorrectly remembering the training schedule and thinking that there were 3 series of 50″/10″, so I agreed with his proposal, thinking that we would 3 full 2k distances of them.

myimage (33)

myimage (34)

It was nice to row this next to the pair. I called out every eigth stroke of the paddle and grunted after the 20th (final) stroke of each interval. I managed to beat them by about a length over one entire 2k course. Looking at the graph, I see we did only 7 intervals per 2k. It felt more like 9 or 10. Anyway, after the first (headwind) and second (tailwind) 2k all three of us were so worn out that we couldn’t think of doing another series. So we just rowed the final 2k at steady state pace, followed by a cooling down.

During the intervals, I saw how I achieved fewer and fewer Watts as the intervals went on. Here, I am trying to see if that is a result of reduced force, length, stroke rate, or both. Stroke rate is excluded. You can already see from the overview chart above that the stroke rate didn’t drop. Here is a look at peak and average force.

 

In the these two plots, you can see that the effective drive length also drops, especially as I am shorter on the finish. I focused on not tapping down too late, because I noticed a very strong effect on “wash”, and also it makes it easier to keep the stroke rate high.

The next plot shows the same, but with effective drive length (taking into account slip and wash) instead of total drive length. I am running my effective drive length at 85% of total drive length. I would be interested to see the values of other people.

I also added a plot of the result, Work per Stroke, for the “on” intervals.

Here are some typical values according to Nielsen-Kellerman, compared to a summary for my “on” strokes. The values closest to my stroke are indicated with the colored cells. I guess I am just lacking in power and strength.

By • Uncategorized • 2 • Tags: , , , , , ,

IMG_2231

May 8 2017

Stroke Analysis of my 1000m singles race

Race Analysis

In this post I am looking at a few detailed metrics of the Masters 1x 1000m race I rowed yesterday. Data were collected with a SpeedCoach GPS 2 combined with a NK Empower Oarlock.

Here is the overview plot of catch and finish angles for the entire outing, including warming up and cooling down. The actual race starts at 1200m. Interesting to see that I seem to suddenly take length about 400m before the finish line. This is exactly the point where I finally passed my opponent and actually started to row at a lower power.

bokeh plot (60)

Here is a close-up of catch and finish angle for the race segment. We’re talking a 1 degree difference, but still it looks pretty consistent and significant.

bokeh plot (61)

So here is the power and average drive force. The start strokes are always at high power and force, as you are starting from a stop and rowing short strokes at high rate. I think I did a pretty good job getting the average force down to an average value and holding that for the rest of the race. It is interesting to see the power drop about half way, while the drive force remains constant, and the catch angle actually increases. That means that I either started to row at a lower stroke rate, or the actual stroke was shorter despite the catch angle being longer.

bokeh plot (62)

The plot thickens when we look at the “Work per Stroke” which drops with the drop in power. So it looks like the stroke rate remained constant, but something else was changing.

bokeh plot (63)

Funny enough, both the absolute drive length and the effective drive length remain constant for the entire race and at pretty good values. So the shift in catch angle was actually me focusing on length (after I had passed my opponent) and tap-down (which makes the stroke slightly shorter at the finish). Should be visible from Wash values.

bokeh plot (64)

Looking at Wash and Slip values, I cannot see a big difference:

bokeh plot (66)

 

Finally, the solution to the riddle seems to be the Peak Drive Force:

bokeh plot (67)

 

Interesting! I hadn’t expected that. The stroke profile plot for the first half of the race:

bokeh plot (68)

And here is the second half of the race. Almost identical to the first half, but the tiny difference do lead to a drop in power, while my pace didn’t drop as much as that of my opponent.

bokeh plot (69)

Here are power and pace in one plot:

bokeh plot (70)

And finally, stroke rate and power:

Monday – Tourism and travel home

Today was a holiday, so we made a few stops on the way home. Here are a few pictures:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

By • Uncategorized • 0 • Tags: , , ,

mm1x.jpg

May 8 2017

Sunday: Masters Racing in Piestany

Three races for me this Sunday. First, a mixed quad sprint (500m) at 9:35. Followed by what I considered to be the main event, the Masters C single, over 1000m, at 10:50. And finally the Masters C double at 13:50.

Masters Mix 4x-

I didn’t know about my start in the mixed quad until Saturday morning. It turns out the local team had been training this discipline, and had written up names of participants from other clubs to create some opponents. So on Saturday morning I discovered my name in the regatta program and my quad partners. Luckily we had a quad on our trailer. I rowed with Michal (the trainer of the boys), my wife Romana, and Michaela from the rowing club in Uherske Hradiste. We were up against the local team from Piestany and a mixed quad from Uherske Hradiste.

I am afraid we messed up the start a bit. We had done some pretty good practice starts during the warming up for the race, but we were not aligned when the referee announced (in Slovak) that he would start the race from the launch and that he would start immediately. As the stroke rower, I still had my blades flat on the water when the starter said “Attention”, and we definitely missed half a stroke.

Half a stroke is quite a lot on a 500m sprint on a fast flowing river. As was proven about 1 minute and 20 seconds later, when we crossed the finish line half a stroke behind the winning Piestany.

I had tried hard. The stroke rate had been in the high 30s for the entire minute and a bit, and my legs were exploding, but it wasn’t enough.

Masters C/D 1x

On to the main event. The Masters singles races were divided in two finals, one with the younger “A” and “B” rowers, and one with three “C” rowers and one “D” rower. In principle, I should win this race.

A few minutes before I wanted to launch, I was fiddling with my SpeedCoach and the single, when it started to rain. I turned around the single in the slings and reached our tent just in time before it started to rain really hard. I saw some of my competitors rowing to the start in the heavy rain. I checked the sky and decided to wait until the rain had completely stopped. It shortened the time before the start a bit, but there was still some reserve, and I figured it was better to arrive at the start line dry and not with a boat filled with water.

For me, the race was an experiment. With the power meter in the boat, I was torn between just rowing my usual race and trying to adhere to a certain power number and trying to flat pace. I guess the end result was a hybrid, but it was interesting.

The “ideal” pace was to row somewhere between 320W and 340W average on the SpeedCoach, 32spm, and try to ignore the other rowers.

I was second out of the start, with the guy from Bratislava a length ahead.

It is very hard for rowers to ignore other rowers in such a race situation. There is nothing better than being the first out of the start and to look at the competitors.

Still, I decided to go to slightly above sustainable pace (350W) but not much higher. So I ended up rowing about 400m behind this Bratislava guy, and then I finally started to move. Looking at the pace values in hindsight, I didn’t really speed up, but he was slowing down. During the race, I could also see that from the Power value, and I must say it was quite a nice feeling to hold 320W and see that I gained on him with every stroke. The passing took about 15 to 20 strokes. Then I was ahead of him and I decided to continue at 32-33spm and trying to hold 320W.

bokeh plot (62)

 

myimage (32)

 

You can see from the power plot that I actually reduced the Power a bit after I had passed the competitor. I think it proves that going out too fast is a bad tactic.

mm1x

 

That was a fast 1000m! Actually, it equals my erg PB. With a big help from the river Vah of course. Third win in a row for me in this race. I will do some detailed analysis in another blog post.

Masters C 2x

I spent the time between the singles race and the start of the doubles organizing a doubles partner. Originally, I was scheduled to row with the Boys trainer Michal, but his boys had a lot of starts around the 2x event, so he preferred to not row it. Finally, I found a guy from the Breclav rowing club wanting to row with me. I went around telling the main competitors so they wouldn’t be surprised and all was fine.

We took one of our club 2x boats, and I was surprised how low it was rigged.

Our main competitors were the double of Marko Milodanovic and Andreas Kral. Marko had won his singles race in a time 8 seconds faster than I. Kral and my partner Antonin were equally fast with 3:31. But of course Marko and Andreas train together regularly.

We rowed next to them for the first 500m. Then we got hit by a big wake, and the Austrians did a better job of rowing through it. In the final 200m we were trying to fight off Bratislava who were taking over. In the end they got us by 0.5 seconds.

After that it was time to help the coaches with their teams and to start preparing the trailer for the trip home. Around 3pm the “packing panic” started, which was worse than normal, because we were traveling with a lot of newby kids who didn’t know the drill, so boats arrived at the trailer in the wrong order, which created a traffic chaos, because the trailer parking was also the main through road from the race venue to the town.

I was glad when I could wave the trailer goodbye and get to my bike. We cycled back to our hotel. Romana and I took an hour of sauna and steam bath, and then we had a nice dinner. Monday would be a holiday, so we didn’t have to travel home immediately after the races.

By • Uncategorized • 2 • Tags: , , ,

beckov_castle_by_f3rd4-d5er1zh

May 4 2017

Mini taper for first sprint race

A 4x250m/250m is my traditional workout during the taper for a 1000m race. It is also the first workout I rowed when I got my SpeedCoach, in July last year, and the exported file from that workout is still one of the test files for rowsandall.com.

So I showed up at the rowing club after work, took my single for a quick spin, and then I prepared the boat for transport to Piestany in Slovakia.

During the warming up I did a few short 10 stroke intervals and test starts, building up the start with one more stroke at a time. First, one stroke. Then, two strokes. Etcetera.

myimage (28)

It was quite choppy, and there were a lot of other boats on the lake. There was a sailing class with lots of sailing boats, and there were people windsurfing. In the end, I decided to do my first two 250m intervals between the buoys of the 2k course, in the headwind. Then turn around and do the other two in tailwind, like this:

map

Here’s the summary:


Workout Summary - media/20170504-175300-Sanders SpeedCoach 20170504 0520pmo.csv
--|Total|-Total-|--Avg--|-Avg-|Avg-|-Avg-|-Max-|-Avg
--|Dist-|-Time--|-Pace--|-Pwr-|SPM-|-HR--|-HR--|-DPS
--|01000|03:52.0|01:56.4|338.7|31.9|174.0|181.0|08.1
W-|01000|03:53.0|01:56.5|338.8|31.9|174.0|181.0|08.1
R-|00000|00:00.0|00:00.0|000.0|00.0|000.0|181.0|00.0
Workout Details
#-|SDist|-Split-|-SPace-|-Pwr-|SPM-|AvgHR|MaxHR|DPS-
00|00250|01:00.4|02:00.7|343.8|31.4|171.7|179.0|07.9
01|00250|01:02.2|02:04.5|334.2|31.6|175.9|181.0|07.6
02|00250|00:55.1|01:50.3|338.8|32.4|172.7|179.0|08.4
03|00250|00:55.3|01:50.5|338.5|32.2|175.8|180.0|08.4

Pretty happy with the result. It wasn’t nice clean flat water rowing. The chop made me concentrate and I didn’t look at the SpeedCoach display much. There was simply too much going on with the chop and the other traffic. I aimed for 320W average. In the end I managed a bit more.

Here are the metrics plots:

We’re leaving tomorrow afternoon. Monday is a holiday, so we plan to stay in Slovakia longer and hike to this castle, close to the town of Piestany where the races are held:

By • Uncategorized • 1 • Tags: , , , , , ,

myimage (25)

May 2 2017

Steady state in the single – working on tap-down

Arrived at the club early but had to wait. My daughter Lenka was out in the single.

I rowed this session together with Martin. I was slightly faster, at slightly lower stroke rates. Happy about that. I kept an eye on the “wash” metric during the entire row and worked on technique to keep its value low.

Today, I have released a few innovations on rowsandall.com. One of them allows you to write annotations in the Flex plot:

As you can see, I made good use of it. The feature was suggested by Greg from Quantified Rowing and I immediately recognized it as a great idea. It greatly improves the workflow when you can capture your thoughts immediately when you create the plot. There isn’t too much you can write about a technique/steady state outing, so the comments on the plots are a bit “empty”, but you get the point.

I also played around a bit with the video editing software DashWare to get it to properly use rowing related metrics. You can read the how-to here. The result:

By • Uncategorized • 1 • Tags: , , , , ,

«< 12 13 14 15 16 >»